KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. vs LOGIC TRANSWAER INDIA PVT LTD AND 2 OTHERS — EXA/437/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020194892014

Filing Number

EXA/1511/2014

Filing Date

21-Aug-2014

Registration No

EXA/437/2015

Registration Date

20-Feb-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.

    Adv. O M Gujar Law Chambers, O M GUJAR LAW CHAMBERS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LOGIC TRANSWAER INDIA PVT LTD AND 2 OTHERS

  2. 2.CROSS FREIGHT INDIA PVT LTD.

  3. 3.AJITH KUMAR NAIR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters (Serial Nos. 903-1091) because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, rendering the appointment void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed all execution and connected applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless an express written agreement waives the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 21-Aug-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/437/2015

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters (Serial Nos. 903-1091) because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, rendering the appointment void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed all execution and connected applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless an express written agreement waives the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case