SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED vs MOHD AMIR SHAIKH — EXA/1759/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020193562025

Filing Number

EXA/19354/2025

Filing Date

27-Jun-2025

Registration No

EXA/1759/2025

Registration Date

08-Sep-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED

    Adv. adv amol shinde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHD AMIR SHAIKH

  2. 2.RAMDULAR D VERMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications and set aside all arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's ruling in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time period already spent excluded from the limitation period, unless there is a written agreement waiving the ineligibility objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 27-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1759/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications and set aside all arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's ruling in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time period already spent excluded from the limitation period, unless there is a written agreement waiving the ineligibility objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case