RENU TIKAMDAS THARANI vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-CIRCLE -4( — ITXA/504/2026
Case under Income Tax Act,1961 Section 260A. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020192312024
e-Filing Number
20-06-2024
Filing Number
ITXA/19226/2024
Filing Date
20-Jun-2024
Registration No
ITXA/504/2026
Registration Date
28-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Bench Type
Division
Category
DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )
Sub-Category
PENALTIES/PROSECUTION/SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 05-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RENU TIKAMDAS THARANI
Adv. Atul K Jasani
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-CIRCLE -4(
-
2.(
-
3.Advocate - Shilpa Goel
-
4.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-4-MUMBAI
Case History
-
05-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Apr-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
Summary: The High Court of Bombay issued a conditional order giving appellants a final two-week deadline to remove office objections to their appeals and file compliance praecipe for registration/numbering. Failure to comply will result in automatic rejection of all 31 listed appeals under O.S. Rule 986. Several advocates appeared for specific appellants, while others did not appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
For Rejection Under Rule 986
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
20-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. ITXA/504/2026
Summary: The High Court of Bombay issued a conditional order giving appellants a final two-week deadline to remove office objections to their appeals and file compliance praecipe for registration/numbering. Failure to comply will result in automatic rejection of all 31 listed appeals under O.S. Rule 986. Several advocates appeared for specific appellants, while others did not appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts