SBI CARDS AND PAYMENTS SERVICES LTD BHUPENDRA MISHRA vs RANDHIR SINGH — EXA/3434/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020192272023

Filing Number

EXA/19220/2023

Filing Date

14-Jul-2023

Registration No

EXA/3434/2024

Registration Date

10-Dec-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SBI CARDS AND PAYMENTS SERVICES LTD BHUPENDRA MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANDHIR SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 applications and set aside arbitral awards across multiple cases, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International, the court ruled such unilateral appointments are void ab initio, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previously disputed period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 14-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/3434/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 applications and set aside arbitral awards across multiple cases, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International, the court ruled such unilateral appointments are void ab initio, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previously disputed period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case