KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. VAISHALI D PADALE vs ABDUL SAMI NIZAMUDDIN SHAIKH AND ANR. — EXA/219/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020191972022

Filing Number

EXA/19191/2022

Filing Date

18-Jun-2022

Registration No

EXA/219/2023

Registration Date

18-Feb-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. VAISHALI D PADALE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL SAMI NIZAMUDDIN SHAIKH AND ANR.

  2. 2.ABDUL GANI NIZAMUDDIN SIDDIQUI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards and dismissed related execution applications after finding that sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, following the Supreme Court's precedent in *Bhadra International*. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the limitation period excluding the time already spent in the void arbitration, unless there was express written waiver of the ineligibility objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 18-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/219/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards and dismissed related execution applications after finding that sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, following the Supreme Court's precedent in *Bhadra International*. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the limitation period excluding the time already spent in the void arbitration, unless there was express written waiver of the ineligibility objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case