Aditya Birla Captial Limited Tikshta Modi vs Masum Ansari — EXA/1958/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020191392025

e-Filing Number

26-06-2025

Filing Number

EXA/19138/2025

Filing Date

26-Jun-2025

Registration No

EXA/1958/2025

Registration Date

16-Sep-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Aditya Birla Captial Limited Tikshta Modi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Masum Ansari

  2. 2.Akhatari Khatun

  3. 3.Mahbub Mia

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards and dismissed execution applications after finding that sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, subject to any express written waivers under Section 12(5) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 17-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

  5. 26-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1958/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards and dismissed execution applications after finding that sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, subject to any express written waivers under Section 12(5) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case