MARICO LIMITED vs Bhawana Cosmetics — HCBM20191262026

Case under Trade Marks Act Section 29. Disposed: DISPOSED OFF on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020191262026

e-Filing Number

05-06-2026

Filing Number

IA/19125/2026

Filing Date

05-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Trade Marks Act Section 29
Copyright Act Section 51

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MARICO LIMITED

    Adv. Niyati Davawala

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhawana Cosmetics

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted Marico Limited's interim application seeking destruction of counterfeit goods bearing infringing marks and artworks seized by the Court Receiver. The court ordered the Court Receiver to destroy the seized inventory after retaining sample items, creating a fresh inventory, and transferring custody to Marico for trial purposes. The Court Receiver was discharged, with Marico liable for all associated costs within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  4. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  5. 18-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Jun-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted Marico Limited's interim application seeking destruction of counterfeit goods bearing infringing marks and artworks seized by the Court Receiver. The court ordered the Court Receiver to destroy the seized inventory after retaining sample items, creating a fresh inventory, and transferring custody to Marico for trial purposes. The Court Receiver was discharged, with Marico liable for all associated costs within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case