L AND T FINANCE LIMITED. vs RAJASHEKAR H R AND ANR. — EXA/2390/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020191212018

Filing Number

EXA/1771/2018

Filing Date

16-Jul-2018

Registration No

EXA/2390/2022

Registration Date

28-Dec-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.L AND T FINANCE LIMITED.

    Adv. O M Gujar Law Chambers

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJASHEKAR H R AND ANR.

  2. 2.SHARADA M

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

    The Bombay High Court allowed L&T Finance Limited's withdrawal of its execution application against Rajashekar H R and others, declaring the underlying arbitral award void-ab-initio because the arbitrator's appointment was unilateral. Following a recent Supreme Court judgment, the court held that arbitral awards can be set aside at the execution stage on this ground, and permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Dismissal Under Rule 329

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

  4. 16-Jul-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2390/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed L&T Finance Limited's withdrawal of its execution application against Rajashekar H R and others, declaring the underlying arbitral award void-ab-initio because the arbitrator's appointment was unilateral. Following a recent Supreme Court judgment, the court held that arbitral awards can be set aside at the execution stage on this ground, and permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case