UNITED PETRO FINANCE LIMITED ADV. NARAYAN AWATE vs ARIHANT INTERNATIONAL AND 2 ORS — EXA/186/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020189732019

Filing Number

EXA/1421/2019

Filing Date

30-Jul-2019

Registration No

EXA/186/2023

Registration Date

15-Feb-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNITED PETRO FINANCE LIMITED ADV. NARAYAN AWATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARIHANT INTERNATIONAL AND 2 ORS

  2. 2.SIRISH LAXMIDAS SANGHAVI

  3. 3.RENU LAXMIDAS SANGHAVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the execution application and set aside the arbitral award because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which the Supreme Court has ruled void ab initio in the Bhadra International case. The court allowed the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless there is an express written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

  4. 06-Jan-2023

    Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))View PDF

  5. 11-Nov-2022

    Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))View PDF

  6. 11-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 30-Jul-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/186/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the execution application and set aside the arbitral award because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which the Supreme Court has ruled void ab initio in the Bhadra International case. The court allowed the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless there is an express written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case