Roshni Cheryl Britto vs Oswald Jovito Dsilva Deceased — HCBM20189622026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 151. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020189622026
e-Filing Number
02-06-2026
Filing Number
TPAC/18961/2026
Filing Date
03-Jun-2026
Judge
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master
Coram
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Roshni Cheryl Britto
Adv. Adv Ameya Suhas Mahajan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Oswald Jovito Dsilva Deceased
-
2.Heston Nicholas Dsilva
-
3.Debra Dennis Furtado
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior MasterView PDF
Case Summary: Roshni Cheryl Britto's Third Party Application seeking certified copies of Testamentary Petition No. 507/2024 records was allowed on 12 June 2026. The court found sufficient cause for the request, as Britto's husband (original petitioner) died on 18 March 2024, leaving her and a minor son without proper representation after the other petitioner failed to bring legal heirs on record. The office was directed to issue certified copies upon payment of charges, with the restriction that copies be used only for stated purposes and not shared with third parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
For Direction
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master
-
03-Jun-2026
Case filed
Case Summary: Roshni Cheryl Britto's Third Party Application seeking certified copies of Testamentary Petition No. 507/2024 records was allowed on 12 June 2026. The court found sufficient cause for the request, as Britto's husband (original petitioner) died on 18 March 2024, leaving her and a minor son without proper representation after the other petitioner failed to bring legal heirs on record. The office was directed to issue certified copies upon payment of charges, with the restriction that copies be used only for stated purposes and not shared with third parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts