Alag Property Constructions vs The Mulund Endeavor Co op Housing Society Pvt Ltd — HCBM20189422026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37(2)(b). Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020189422026
e-Filing Number
03-06-2026
Filing Number
CARBP/18941/2026
Filing Date
03-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Alag Property Constructions
Adv. Sanjay Prabhakar Shinde
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Mulund Endeavor Co op Housing Society Pvt Ltd
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
Due Matters - Adjourned OS
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
11-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
Summary: In this Commercial Arbitration Petition, Alag Property Constructions sought urgent relief to enforce an arbitrator's interim order requiring Mulund Endeavor Co-op Housing Society to vacate property and allow re-entry within 21 days (ending 12 June 2026). The court found no case for urgency because the respondent had e-filed an application seeking discontinuation of the Court Receiver (who held symbolic possession), but this application remained unnumbered and unserved. Without the Court Receiver's discontinuation being properly processed, the tribunal-appointed private receiver could not take possession as directed. The petition was dismissed without interim order, and the matter was adjourned to 15 June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jun-2026
Case filed
Summary: In this Commercial Arbitration Petition, Alag Property Constructions sought urgent relief to enforce an arbitrator's interim order requiring Mulund Endeavor Co-op Housing Society to vacate property and allow re-entry within 21 days (ending 12 June 2026). The court found no case for urgency because the respondent had e-filed an application seeking discontinuation of the Court Receiver (who held symbolic possession), but this application remained unnumbered and unserved. Without the Court Receiver's discontinuation being properly processed, the tribunal-appointed private receiver could not take possession as directed. The petition was dismissed without interim order, and the matter was adjourned to 15 June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts