Alag Property Constructions vs The Mulund Endeavor Co op Housing Society Pvt Ltd — HCBM20189422026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37(2)(b). Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020189422026
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
03-06-2026
Filing Number
CARBP/18941/2026
Filing Date
03-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Alag Property Constructions
Adv. Sanjay Prabhakar Shinde
Respondent(s)
The Mulund Endeavor Co op Housing Society Pvt Ltd
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA
FOR CIRCULATION
DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 15-06-2026 | DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS |
Orders
Summary: In this Commercial Arbitration Petition, Alag Property Constructions sought urgent relief to enforce an arbitrator's interim order requiring Mulund Endeavor Co-op Housing Society to vacate property and allow re-entry within 21 days (ending 12 June 2026). The court found no case for urgency because the respondent had e-filed an application seeking discontinuation of the Court Receiver (who held symbolic possession), but this application remained unnumbered and unserved. Without the Court Receiver's discontinuation being properly processed, the tribunal-appointed private receiver could not take possession as directed. The petition was dismissed without interim order, and the matter was adjourned to 15 June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this Commercial Arbitration Petition, Alag Property Constructions sought urgent relief to enforce an arbitrator's interim order requiring Mulund Endeavor Co-op Housing Society to vacate property and allow re-entry within 21 days (ending 12 June 2026). The court found no case for urgency because the respondent had e-filed an application seeking discontinuation of the Court Receiver (who held symbolic possession), but this application remained unnumbered and unserved. Without the Court Receiver's discontinuation being properly processed, the tribunal-appointed private receiver could not take possession as directed. The petition was dismissed without interim order, and the matter was adjourned to 15 June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts