AMBIT FINVEST PRIVATE LIMITED vs BHAARATGALAXEE INFOTECH — EXA/1314/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020189152025

Filing Number

EXA/18914/2025

Filing Date

25-Jun-2025

Registration No

EXA/1314/2025

Registration Date

16-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMBIT FINVEST PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. Kiran Pahwa

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAARATGALAXEE INFOTECH

  2. 2.RAJAN N RANE

  3. 3.SUPRIYA RAJAN RANE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications and set aside all arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator's appointment was found to be unilateral, following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International* that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous time period excluded from limitation calculations, unless there was an express written agreement waiving the objection to the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 25-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1314/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications and set aside all arbitral awards where the sole arbitrator's appointment was found to be unilateral, following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International* that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous time period excluded from limitation calculations, unless there was an express written agreement waiving the objection to the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case