LEIGHTON OFFSHORE ECLIPSE PTE LIMITED J SAGAR AND ASSOCIATES vs DLB KENENNA IMO 8354562 — HCBM20186002026
Case under Admirality (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act Section 2 1 1. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020186002026
Next Hearing
: -
e-Filing Number
01-06-2026
Filing Number
COMAS/18600/2026
Filing Date
01-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
Bench Type
Single
Category
ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAWS ( 2 )
Sub-Category
ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAWS ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LEIGHTON OFFSHORE ECLIPSE PTE LIMITED J SAGAR AND ASSOCIATES
Respondent(s)
DLB KENENNA IMO 8354562
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
FOR CIRCULATION (O.S)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION (O.S) |
Orders
Case Summary Leighton Offshore Eclipse PTE Limited v. DLB Kenenna (IMO 8354562) The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division granted an order for arrest of the defendant vessel on June 1, 2026. Leighton sought vessel arrest to secure approximately USD 18.03 million in claims arising from a charter party agreement, including unpaid charter hire, crew salaries, and equipment costs. Though USD 10.75 million was already secured through pending arbitration, Leighton claimed approximately USD 7.28 million remained unsecured. The court found a prima facie maritime claim under the Admiralty Act, 2017, and established a nexus between the registered owner (Westfield Subsea Ltd) and the real beneficial owner (Westfield Energy Resources Ltd), allowing the in rem action despite concurrent arbitration proceedings. The vessel at Dabhol Port was arrested with a directive to release only upon furnishing security within eight weeks or face auction proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Leighton Offshore Eclipse PTE Limited v. DLB Kenenna (IMO 8354562) The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division granted an order for arrest of the defendant vessel on June 1, 2026. Leighton sought vessel arrest to secure approximately USD 18.03 million in claims arising from a charter party agreement, including unpaid charter hire, crew salaries, and equipment costs. Though USD 10.75 million was already secured through pending arbitration, Leighton claimed approximately USD 7.28 million remained unsecured. The court found a prima facie maritime claim under the Admiralty Act, 2017, and established a nexus between the registered owner (Westfield Subsea Ltd) and the real beneficial owner (Westfield Energy Resources Ltd), allowing the in rem action despite concurrent arbitration proceedings. The vessel at Dabhol Port was arrested with a directive to release only upon furnishing security within eight weeks or face auction proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts