LEIGHTON OFFSHORE ECLIPSE PTE LIMITED J SAGAR AND ASSOCIATES vs DLB KENENNA IMO 8354562 — HCBM20186002026

Case under Admirality (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act Section 2 1 1. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM020186002026

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

01-06-2026

Filing Number

COMAS/18600/2026

Filing Date

01-06-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

Bench Type

Single

Category

ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAWS ( 2 )

Sub-Category

ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAWS ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Admirality (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act Section 2 1 1

Petitioner(s)

LEIGHTON OFFSHORE ECLIPSE PTE LIMITED J SAGAR AND ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

DLB KENENNA IMO 8354562

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

01-06-2026

FOR CIRCULATION (O.S)

Orders

01-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

Case Summary Leighton Offshore Eclipse PTE Limited v. DLB Kenenna (IMO 8354562) The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division granted an order for arrest of the defendant vessel on June 1, 2026. Leighton sought vessel arrest to secure approximately USD 18.03 million in claims arising from a charter party agreement, including unpaid charter hire, crew salaries, and equipment costs. Though USD 10.75 million was already secured through pending arbitration, Leighton claimed approximately USD 7.28 million remained unsecured. The court found a prima facie maritime claim under the Admiralty Act, 2017, and established a nexus between the registered owner (Westfield Subsea Ltd) and the real beneficial owner (Westfield Energy Resources Ltd), allowing the in rem action despite concurrent arbitration proceedings. The vessel at Dabhol Port was arrested with a directive to release only upon furnishing security within eight weeks or face auction proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Leighton Offshore Eclipse PTE Limited v. DLB Kenenna (IMO 8354562) The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division granted an order for arrest of the defendant vessel on June 1, 2026. Leighton sought vessel arrest to secure approximately USD 18.03 million in claims arising from a charter party agreement, including unpaid charter hire, crew salaries, and equipment costs. Though USD 10.75 million was already secured through pending arbitration, Leighton claimed approximately USD 7.28 million remained unsecured. The court found a prima facie maritime claim under the Admiralty Act, 2017, and established a nexus between the registered owner (Westfield Subsea Ltd) and the real beneficial owner (Westfield Energy Resources Ltd), allowing the in rem action despite concurrent arbitration proceedings. The vessel at Dabhol Port was arrested with a directive to release only upon furnishing security within eight weeks or face auction proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case