ABDUL LATIF HASAN SHAIKH vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GR MUMBAI TH. THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER — HCBM20185252026

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020185252026

Filing Number

WP/18525/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Coram

Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Bench Type

Division

Category

LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )

Sub-Category

Municipal Corporation ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL LATIF HASAN SHAIKH

    Adv. Vijay Kurle

  2. 2.FEROZ S. KHAN

  3. 3.ASHWINI ANIL MAYEKAR

  4. 4.ASHRAF LUKMAN KHATRI

  5. 5.ASHRAF LUKMAN KHATRI

  6. 6.MUSTAKIM M. KHATRI

  7. 7.DATTARAM AMBEKAR

  8. 8.MOHD. ASIF ABDUL LATIF

  9. 9.MOHD. SAJID N. M. SHAIKH

  10. 10.HARISH MOHAN NAYAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GR MUMBAI TH. THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

  2. 2.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER MAINTENANCE DEPT.

  4. 4.SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY TH. ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  5. 5.THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR / COMPETENT AUTHORITY

  6. 6.NEEL DHARA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.

  7. 7.R. G. CORPORATION / R.G. CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPER OF NEEL DHARA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD

  8. 8.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TH. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOUSING DEPT. / URBEN DEVELOPMENT DEPT.

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF

    The case could not be heard on 9th June 2026 due to paucity of time. The court adjourned the matter, directing petitioners to remove office objections within two weeks and supply spare copies for notice issuance within 14 days, failing which the matter would be dismissed against unserved respondents. The case was rescheduled for various dates in June-July 2026 for fresh/urgent admission and due admission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The case could not be heard on 9th June 2026 due to paucity of time. The court adjourned the matter, directing petitioners to remove office objections within two weeks and supply spare copies for notice issuance within 14 days, failing which the matter would be dismissed against unserved respondents. The case was rescheduled for various dates in June-July 2026 for fresh/urgent admission and due admission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case