SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED) vs CHANDRABHAN BALLIPRASAD GUPTA — EXA/208/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020184922023

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

EXA/18485/2023

Filing Date

07-07-2023

Registration No

EXA/208/2024

Registration Date

05-02-2024

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED)

Adv. Sudhir Upadhyay

Respondent(s)

CHANDRABHAN BALLIPRASAD GUPTA

SATISH YESHWANT PONKSHE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

17-04-2026

For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and therefore void ab initio, following Supreme Court precedent in Bhadra International. The court dismissed execution applications and allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the limitation period from the original arbitration invocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and therefore void ab initio, following Supreme Court precedent in Bhadra International. The court dismissed execution applications and allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the limitation period from the original arbitration invocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case