ARYADEEP INVESTMENT AND HOLDING PRIVATE LTD. vs JAVED ISMAIL JHAVERI Advocate - Pranav Avhad, ,Darshna Naval — S/345/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020184382025
Filing Number
S/18434/2025
Filing Date
20-Jun-2025
Registration No
S/345/2025
Registration Date
14-Nov-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Single
Category
SUITS ( 38 )
Sub-Category
FOR DECLARATION GENERAL ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARYADEEP INVESTMENT AND HOLDING PRIVATE LTD.
Adv. Solicis Lex
-
2.JATOYAH INVESTMENTS AND HOLDING LIMITED
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAVED ISMAIL JHAVERI Advocate - Pranav Avhad, ,Darshna Naval
-
2.ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY (INDIA) LIMITED
Adv. Manaswi Agrawal,SHANTANU RAY
-
3.JAYANT SAHU
-
4.NIRMAL BARUAH
-
5.KAMAL MISHRA
-
6.MERAJ SAYED
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
17-Apr-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
Case Summary: S/345/2025 The court adjourned the case to 29.06.2026 with directions for plaintiffs to serve defendants with Writ of Summons and file affidavit of service by next date, failing which the suit will be dismissed for non-compliance of O.S. Rule 87. Liberty was granted to plaintiffs to serve defendants through all modes including service upon their advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
For Direction
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
09-Oct-2025
Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF
-
10-Sep-2025
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
-
10-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. S/345/2025
Case Summary: S/345/2025 The court adjourned the case to 29.06.2026 with directions for plaintiffs to serve defendants with Writ of Summons and file affidavit of service by next date, failing which the suit will be dismissed for non-compliance of O.S. Rule 87. Liberty was granted to plaintiffs to serve defendants through all modes including service upon their advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts