PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 PUNE vs FIS SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE INDIA PVT LTD 2018 19 — ITXA/503/2026

Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 143. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

Next hearing 05-May-2026

CNR: HCBM020184312024

e-Filing Number

14-06-2024

Filing Number

ITXA/18425/2024

Filing Date

14-Jun-2024

Registration No

ITXA/503/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )

Sub-Category

PENALTIES/PROSECUTION/SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 143

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 PUNE

    Adv. ARJUN GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FIS SOLUTIONS SOFTWARE INDIA PVT LTD 2018 19

Case History

  1. 05-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    Summary The High Court of Bombay has given appellants a final opportunity to remove office objections to their appeals and obtain registration/numbering by filing compliance praecipe within two weeks from the order date (01st April, 2026). Failure to comply will result in automatic rejection of the appeals under O.S. Rule 986 for non-compliance of office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 14-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. ITXA/503/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Bombay has given appellants a final opportunity to remove office objections to their appeals and obtain registration/numbering by filing compliance praecipe within two weeks from the order date (01st April, 2026). Failure to comply will result in automatic rejection of the appeals under O.S. Rule 986 for non-compliance of office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case