GIC Insuflex Conductors Pvt Ltd vs State Of Maharashtra Advocate - GP OS — HCBM20183132025
Case under The Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act,2017 Section Article 226 of the Constitution of India 1950;. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020183132025
e-Filing Number
19-06-2025
Filing Number
WP/18312/2025
Filing Date
20-Jun-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Division
Category
DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )
Sub-Category
GST GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GIC Insuflex Conductors Pvt Ltd
Adv. Akil Ashok Kupade
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of Maharashtra Advocate - GP OS
-
2.DGGI Mumbai Zonal Unit
-
3.Additional Commissioner
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
The court document is a procedural order from the Bombay High Court dated 17th June 2026 concerning multiple petitions listed for rejection. The order gives petitioners a final opportunity to remove office objections and get their petitions registered/numbered by filing compliance within two weeks; failure to comply will result in automatic rejection of the petitions under O.S.Rule 986. The specific case of GIC Insuflex Conductors Pvt Ltd cannot be individually identified from this batch order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
For Rejection Under Rule 986
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
20-Jun-2025
Case filed
The court document is a procedural order from the Bombay High Court dated 17th June 2026 concerning multiple petitions listed for rejection. The order gives petitioners a final opportunity to remove office objections and get their petitions registered/numbered by filing compliance within two weeks; failure to comply will result in automatic rejection of the petitions under O.S.Rule 986. The specific case of GIC Insuflex Conductors Pvt Ltd cannot be individually identified from this batch order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts