MAYANK J SHAH DSK LEGAL, ,DSK LEGAL vs RAJU V SHAH — CARBP/409/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 17. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020182872024

e-Filing Number

14-06-2024

Filing Number

CARBP/18281/2024

Filing Date

14-Jun-2024

Registration No

CARBP/409/2025

Registration Date

27-May-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

Challenge Tribunal Order under Section 17 ( 105 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 17

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAYANK J SHAH DSK LEGAL, ,DSK LEGAL

  2. 2.SHREYANS SHAH

    Adv. DSK LEGAL

  3. 3.SHRUTI M SHAH

    Adv. DSK LEGAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJU V SHAH

    Adv. ,MULLA AND MULLA AND CBC 1123

  2. 2.KALPANA SHAH

  3. 3.VIDHI RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

  4. 4.CENTRIO LIFESPACE LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Part-Heard

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

    The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division noted that the arbitral tribunal has concluded its hearing in the dispute between Mayank J Shah and Raju V Shah. The court accepted the respondent's affidavit confirming the completion of arbitration proceedings, which was uncontested by the petitioner. The order directed that all subsequent actions be taken upon receipt of the downloaded copy from the court's website. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Section 37 OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  8. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  9. 26-Mar-2026

    Section 37 OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  10. 18-Feb-2026

    Section 37 OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  11. 02-Feb-2026

    Section 37 OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  12. 05-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  13. 05-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing- Section 37

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  14. 25-Nov-2025

    Final Hearing-Section 34

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  15. 14-Oct-2025

    Final Hearing-Section 34

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  16. 10-Sep-2025

    Post-Notice- Section 37

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  17. 13-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  18. 13-Aug-2025

    Post-Notice- Section 37

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  19. 17-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  20. 17-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  21. 17-Jul-2025

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  22. 12-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  23. 12-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 14-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CARBP/409/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division noted that the arbitral tribunal has concluded its hearing in the dispute between Mayank J Shah and Raju V Shah. The court accepted the respondent's affidavit confirming the completion of arbitration proceedings, which was uncontested by the petitioner. The order directed that all subsequent actions be taken upon receipt of the downloaded copy from the court's website. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case