JAI VINAYAK METAL CORPORATION ANJESH PANDIT AND CO vs UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE — WP/2610/2026
Case under Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section 74. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM020182702026
e-Filing Number
25-05-2026
Filing Number
WP/18270/2026
Filing Date
25-May-2026
Registration No
WP/2610/2026
Registration Date
28-May-2026
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAI VINAYAK METAL CORPORATION ANJESH PANDIT AND CO
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
-
2.ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (AE) CGST AND C.EX, SHRI. MALLINATH K. JEURE
-
3.ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER CGST AND CX MUMBAI CENTRAL, SHRI. SREEKANTH MUSULURU
Case History
-
09-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jul-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
08-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
Case Summary: WP/2610/2026 Outcome: The Bombay High Court granted an interim protective order and tagged the petition with similar pending matters. The court restrained revenue authorities from taking any coercive action against Jai Vinayak Metal Corporation pending final adjudication before a Larger Bench scheduled for July 2026. Respondents were directed to file their reply within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2610/2026
Case Summary: WP/2610/2026 Outcome: The Bombay High Court granted an interim protective order and tagged the petition with similar pending matters. The court restrained revenue authorities from taking any coercive action against Jai Vinayak Metal Corporation pending final adjudication before a Larger Bench scheduled for July 2026. Respondents were directed to file their reply within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts