NADIR KHAN PARDUL KHAN, THROUGH THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MEHJABEEN S. QURESHI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — HCBM20182482025
Case under Metropolitan Region Development Authority Rules (Maharashtra) Section 226. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020182482025
Filing Number
WP/18247/2025
Filing Date
19-Jun-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Division
Category
TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )
Sub-Category
MMRDA ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NADIR KHAN PARDUL KHAN, THROUGH THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MEHJABEEN S. QURESHI
Adv. Suresh Dubey
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
-
2.MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, THROUGH THE METROPOLITAN COMMISSIONER
-
3.SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER (
-
4., MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT
-
5.THE SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
The court issued an order on 17th June 2026 regarding multiple Writ Petitions (WPL) before the Bombay High Court. The Prothonotary and Senior Master gave petitioners a final opportunity to remove office objections and get their petitions registered/numbered by filing compliance within two weeks; failing which all petitions shall stand rejected for non-compliance under O.S.Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
For Rejection Under Rule 986
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
19-Jun-2025
Case filed
The court issued an order on 17th June 2026 regarding multiple Writ Petitions (WPL) before the Bombay High Court. The Prothonotary and Senior Master gave petitioners a final opportunity to remove office objections and get their petitions registered/numbered by filing compliance within two weeks; failing which all petitions shall stand rejected for non-compliance under O.S.Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts