INTEGRO FINSERV PRIVATE LIMITED vs CFM ASSET RECONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD. AND 2 ORS — IA/2680/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
CNR: HCBM020182302022
Filing Number
IA/18224/2022
Filing Date
09-Jun-2022
Registration No
IA/2680/2022
Registration Date
15-Jun-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.INTEGRO FINSERV PRIVATE LIMITED
Adv. DS LAW
Respondent(s)
-
1.CFM ASSET RECONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD. AND 2 ORS
Case History
-
22-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Jul-2026
Due Matters - Adjourned OS
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
Case Summary: IA/2680/2022 Outcome: Petition Allowed The Bombay High Court allowed Integro Finserv Private Limited's interim application seeking substitution as Claimant/Decree Holder in place of CFM Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. The court found that through successive assignments under SARFAESI Act 2002, the debt obligations were lawfully transferred from L&T Finance to CFM (2019) and then to Integro Finserv (2022), thereby vesting all rights in the applicant. The court directed amendments within four weeks and mandated service of amended documents upon respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. IA/2680/2022
Case Summary: IA/2680/2022 Outcome: Petition Allowed The Bombay High Court allowed Integro Finserv Private Limited's interim application seeking substitution as Claimant/Decree Holder in place of CFM Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. The court found that through successive assignments under SARFAESI Act 2002, the debt obligations were lawfully transferred from L&T Finance to CFM (2019) and then to Integro Finserv (2022), thereby vesting all rights in the applicant. The court directed amendments within four weeks and mandated service of amended documents upon respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts