JYOTIN CHHAFALAL GANDHI vs THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ZONE-II — WP/2685/2026

Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020180292026

Filing Number

WP/18029/2026

Filing Date

21-May-2026

Registration No

WP/2685/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

MHADA ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JYOTIN CHHAFALAL GANDHI

    Adv. Yatin R Shah

  2. 2.SANDEEP B. SHAH

  3. 3.HARSH DIVECHA

  4. 4.CHETAN PAREKH

  5. 5.VIKRAM PAREKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ZONE-II

  2. 2.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, D3 DIVISION,

  3. 3.THE MBRRB, THE BOMBAY REPAIR AND RECONSTRUCTION BOARD, A UNIT OF MHADA

  4. 4.LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA

  5. 5.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. GOVERNMENT PLEADER,

    Adv. GP OS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/2685/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging MHADA's eviction notice for a building the petitioners claimed was in sound condition and not listed as dilapidated. The court, noting that interpretation of Section 79(A) of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 was pending before the Supreme Court, directed MHADA to provide three weeks' notice before taking any eviction or demolition action. The court expressly reserved all contentions for future adjudication, making no determination on the substantive issues raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  4. 21-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2685/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/2685/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging MHADA's eviction notice for a building the petitioners claimed was in sound condition and not listed as dilapidated. The court, noting that interpretation of Section 79(A) of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 was pending before the Supreme Court, directed MHADA to provide three weeks' notice before taking any eviction or demolition action. The court expressly reserved all contentions for future adjudication, making no determination on the substantive issues raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case