TARAMATI HARISHCHANDRA MORE vs HARISHCHANDRA ANNA MORE DECEASED — MPT/696/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020177642026
e-Filing Number
16-05-2026
Filing Number
MPT/17764/2026
Filing Date
18-May-2026
Registration No
MPT/696/2026
Registration Date
20-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe
Coram
Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe
Bench Type
Single
Category
PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )
Sub-Category
HEIRSHIP CERTIFICATE. ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TARAMATI HARISHCHANDRA MORE
Adv. VINAYAK R SALOKHE
Respondent(s)
-
1.HARISHCHANDRA ANNA MORE DECEASED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
Case Summary: MPT/696/2026 The Bombay High Court granted Taramati Harischandra More's petition for a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 for the intestate estate of her deceased husband, Harischandra Anna More (died 27 November 2023). The court issued the certificate identifying three legal heirs: the petitioner (widow) and her two sons (Umesh and Rohan), dispensing with the requirement for proclamation based on the sons' consent affidavits and absence of competing succession claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Misc. Petition For Admission / Final Hearing [Under Bombay Regulation Act ,Viii]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
-
18-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MPT/696/2026
Case Summary: MPT/696/2026 The Bombay High Court granted Taramati Harischandra More's petition for a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 for the intestate estate of her deceased husband, Harischandra Anna More (died 27 November 2023). The court issued the certificate identifying three legal heirs: the petitioner (widow) and her two sons (Umesh and Rohan), dispensing with the requirement for proclamation based on the sons' consent affidavits and absence of competing succession claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts