Tyger Capital Private Limited Tikshta Modi vs Shafy Ulla — EXA/2033/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM020174602025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

11-06-2025

Filing Number

EXA/17459/2025

Filing Date

12-06-2025

Registration No

EXA/2033/2025

Registration Date

19-09-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure (Maharashtra Amendment) Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

Tyger Capital Private Limited Tikshta Modi

Respondent(s)

Shafy Ulla

Shaik Jamal SA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

08-06-2026

For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

Orders

08-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in consolidated matters (Serial Nos. 902-925) because the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International ruling that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in consolidated matters (Serial Nos. 902-925) because the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International ruling that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case