CITICORP FINANCE (INDIA) LTD. S. I JOSHI and CO. vs RASHPALSINGH BHULLAR AND ANR. — HCBM20174452011

Case under Miscellaneous Act (1). Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020174452011

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

Filing Number

EXA/1268/2011

Filing Date

28-07-2011

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Miscellaneous Act (1)

Petitioner(s)

CITICORP FINANCE (INDIA) LTD. S. I JOSHI and CO.

Respondent(s)

RASHPALSINGH BHULLAR AND ANR.

KAPOOR SINGH

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

16-01-2013

FOR REJECTION [ORIGINAL SIDE MATTERS]

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA

Summary: The High Court of Bombay dismissed all applications (Serial Nos. 901, 903, 904, and 916-1148) and set aside the respective arbitral awards because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, which is void ab initio per the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International case. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings in accordance with law, excluding the time period already spent in the void arbitration from the limitation period, and permitted parties to apply if they have a written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Bombay dismissed all applications (Serial Nos. 901, 903, 904, and 916-1148) and set aside the respective arbitral awards because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, which is void ab initio per the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International case. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings in accordance with law, excluding the time period already spent in the void arbitration from the limitation period, and permitted parties to apply if they have a written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case