CITICORP FINANCE (INDIA) LTD. S. I JOSHI and CO. vs RASHPALSINGH BHULLAR AND ANR. — HCBM20174452011

Case under Miscellaneous Act (1). Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

Next hearing 15-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM020174452011

Filing Number

EXA/1268/2011

Filing Date

28-Jul-2011

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Miscellaneous Act (1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CITICORP FINANCE (INDIA) LTD. S. I JOSHI and CO.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RASHPALSINGH BHULLAR AND ANR.

  2. 2.KAPOOR SINGH

Case History

  1. 15-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Bombay dismissed all applications (Serial Nos. 901, 903, 904, and 916-1148) and set aside the respective arbitral awards because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, which is void ab initio per the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International case. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings in accordance with law, excluding the time period already spent in the void arbitration from the limitation period, and permitted parties to apply if they have a written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jan-2013

    For Rejection [Original Side Matters]

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. Master

  4. 28-Jul-2011

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Bombay dismissed all applications (Serial Nos. 901, 903, 904, and 916-1148) and set aside the respective arbitral awards because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, which is void ab initio per the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International case. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings in accordance with law, excluding the time period already spent in the void arbitration from the limitation period, and permitted parties to apply if they have a written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case