Mohammed Siraj alias Mohammed Siraj alias Mohammed shakeel BHANDARE NARENDRA VISHNU vs Mohammed Shakil Rahat Hussain — MPT/686/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020174122026

e-Filing Number

11-05-2026

Filing Number

MPT/17412/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

MPT/686/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe

Coram

Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe

Bench Type

Single

Category

PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )

Sub-Category

HEIRSHIP CERTIFICATE. ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohammed Siraj alias Mohammed Siraj alias Mohammed shakeel BHANDARE NARENDRA VISHNU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohammed Shakil Rahat Hussain

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted a legal heirship certificate to Mohammed Siraj and four other heirs of the deceased Mohammed Shakil Rahat Hussain, who died intestate in 2018. The court held that the right to apply for a heirship certificate is a continuous right not barred by limitation, and condoned the delay in filing the petition since all legal heirs had provided consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Misc. Petition For Admission / Final Hearing [Under Bombay Regulation Act ,Viii]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

  4. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MPT/686/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted a legal heirship certificate to Mohammed Siraj and four other heirs of the deceased Mohammed Shakil Rahat Hussain, who died intestate in 2018. The court held that the right to apply for a heirship certificate is a continuous right not barred by limitation, and condoned the delay in filing the petition since all legal heirs had provided consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case