YASIR MUSTAFA SYED, TRUSTEE AND MUTAWALI OF THE ISLAMIYA MASJID TRUST TOOBA MOMIN IBUSHE vs MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY — WP/2195/2025
Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020173672025
Filing Number
WP/17366/2025
Filing Date
12-Jun-2025
Registration No
WP/2195/2025
Registration Date
23-Jun-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Bench Type
Division
Category
TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )
Sub-Category
MHADA ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 06-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.YASIR MUSTAFA SYED, TRUSTEE AND MUTAWALI OF THE ISLAMIYA MASJID TRUST TOOBA MOMIN IBUSHE
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
-
2.MUMBAI BUILDING REPAIRS AND RECONSTRUCTION BOARD, THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER
-
3.DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ZONE IV, MUMBAI BUILDING REPAIRS AND RECONSTRUCTION BOARD
-
4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, G/NORTH DIVISION, MUMBAI BUILDING REPAIRS AND RECONSTRUCTION BOARD
-
5.MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF WAQFS, THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Adv. Saga Legal
-
6.ZIA-UL HASAN NURUL HASAN SYED
Adv. Mohammed Umar Kazi,S. W. SANTIS
-
7.YAFIS HASAN ALI SYED
Adv. Mohammed Umar Kazi,S. W. SANTIS
-
8.SALMAN HASAN ALI SYED
Adv. Mohammed Umar Kazi,S. W. SANTIS
-
9.ATHAR HASAN ALI SYED
Adv. Mohammed Umar Kazi,S. W. SANTIS
-
10.ANAS MUSTAFA HASAN SYED
Adv. Mohammed Umar Kazi,S. W. SANTIS
-
11.MUNNA KOYLIWALA ALIAS FATEH BAHADUR SINGH
-
12.HARAKMAL JAIN
-
13.SUDHAKAR S. BOTLA
-
14.SAGAR KAMTAN
-
15.NANDKISHOR DOIPHODE
-
16.DIGAMBAR DOIPHODE
-
17.MAHADEV LONDHE
-
18.RUPALI DOIPHODE
-
19.JAVED ALWI
-
20.ANAWAR ALWI
-
21.HUSSAIN SHOJAI
-
22.MOHAMMED JAWAD SAKI
-
23.ZEENAT SHABBIR MIRZA
-
24.ZAHIRA ILIYAS SHAKIR
-
25.SHABBIR MIRZA
-
26.ILIYAS SHAKIR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
Summary The Bombay High Court disposed of two writ petitions challenging notices issued by MHADA under Section 79A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976. The court directed that the impugned notices be kept in abeyance pending completion of inquiry and directed MHADA to reconsider the matter in accordance with precedent directions from earlier cases (Vimalnath Shelters and Javed Abdul Rahim Attar), with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the court if any adverse order is passed by MHADA. In the second petition, the court directed MHADA to decide pending applications within three months in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
10-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
-
13-Oct-2025
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe
-
06-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
-
11-Aug-2025
Balance Board
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
-
04-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
07-Jul-2025
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
-
30-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
30-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2195/2025
Summary The Bombay High Court disposed of two writ petitions challenging notices issued by MHADA under Section 79A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976. The court directed that the impugned notices be kept in abeyance pending completion of inquiry and directed MHADA to reconsider the matter in accordance with precedent directions from earlier cases (Vimalnath Shelters and Javed Abdul Rahim Attar), with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the court if any adverse order is passed by MHADA. In the second petition, the court directed MHADA to decide pending applications within three months in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts