ASHA RATILAL ADATIA vs RUPA MANILAL ADATIA DECEASED — HCBM20171712025
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 278. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
CNR: HCBM020171712025
e-Filing Number
10-06-2025
Filing Number
TP/17170/2025
Filing Date
10-Jun-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Letters of Administration without Will ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHA RATILAL ADATIA
Adv. VIVEK M SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.RUPA MANILAL ADATIA DECEASED
Case History
-
24-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Mar-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
Summary: The Bombay High Court issued an order on 24th March 2026 regarding 18 petitions (TPL matters) marked for rejection. The Court granted petitioners a final opportunity to remove office objections and get their petitions registered/numbered by filing compliance praecipe within four weeks. Petitions will be rejected for non-compliance with office objections under O.S.Rule 986 if the deadline is not met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Oct-2025
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
06-Oct-2025
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
08-Sep-2025
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
08-Sep-2025
For Amendment
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
-
10-Jun-2025
Case filed
Summary: The Bombay High Court issued an order on 24th March 2026 regarding 18 petitions (TPL matters) marked for rejection. The Court granted petitioners a final opportunity to remove office objections and get their petitions registered/numbered by filing compliance praecipe within four weeks. Petitions will be rejected for non-compliance with office objections under O.S.Rule 986 if the deadline is not met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts