MOHAMMED SAYED MOHAMMED SIDDIQUE vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER-H/EAST WARD AND ANR — NMW/291/2018
Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act. Next hearing: 21st September 2020.
CNR: HCBM020171272018
Filing Number
NMW/411/2018
Filing Date
26-Jun-2018
Registration No
NMW/291/2018
Registration Date
05-Jul-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice S.J. Kathawalla
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice S.J. Kathawalla
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHAMMED SAYED MOHAMMED SIDDIQUE
Adv. Aparna Kalathil,PETITIONER,PETITIONER, ,Aparna Kalathil,PETITIONER
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER-H/EAST WARD AND ANR
-
2.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
Case History
-
21-Sep-2020
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF
Case Summary: NMW/291/2018 Mohammed Sayed Mohammed Siddique challenged a Final Notice dated 5th February 2018 and an Assistant Commissioner decision declaring his premises "not eligible" for protection under municipal law. On 9th June 2026, the Bombay High Court adjourned the case to 17th June 2026 after the petitioner's counsel requested time to obtain instructions on whether the cause of action still survives given the considerable delay in listing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Sep-2020
For Admission -Fresh (Cmis)
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice S.J. Kathawalla
-
26-Jun-2018
Case filed
Registration No. NMW/291/2018
Case Summary: NMW/291/2018 Mohammed Sayed Mohammed Siddique challenged a Final Notice dated 5th February 2018 and an Assistant Commissioner decision declaring his premises "not eligible" for protection under municipal law. On 9th June 2026, the Bombay High Court adjourned the case to 17th June 2026 after the petitioner's counsel requested time to obtain instructions on whether the cause of action still survives given the considerable delay in listing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts