ACHAL JATIA vs AMIT JATIA — IA/2689/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 1. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020170252025
Filing Number
IA/17024/2025
Filing Date
09-Jun-2025
Registration No
IA/2689/2025
Registration Date
23-Jun-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
Bench Type
Single
Category
SUITS ( 38 )
Sub-Category
OTHER ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ACHAL JATIA
Adv. RASHMIKANT AND PARTNERS
Respondent(s)
-
1.AMIT JATIA
-
2.SMITA JATIA
-
3.AKSHAY JATIA
-
4.AYUSH JATIA
-
5.MEHAK JATIA
-
6.DIYA JATIA
-
7.ANURAG JATIA
-
8.BANWARI LAL JATIA
Adv. DHRUVE LILADHAR AND CO
-
9.USHA DEVI JATIA
Adv. DHRUVE LILADHAR AND CO
-
10.SHRADDHA PRITHVI RJ
-
11.HEMANN JATIA
-
12.HORIZON IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED
-
13.SUBH ASHISH EXIM PRIVATE LIMITED
Case History
-
07-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
At 3.30 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF
Case Summary: IA/2689/2025 - Achal Jatia v. Amit Jatia & Ors. The High Court of Bombay adjourned these consolidated interim applications (relating to Suit Nos. 148 and 172 of 2025) on 4th May 2026. The court accepted six affidavits-in-reply filed by the plaintiff in Suit 172 of 2025 in response to interim applications by contesting defendants. The matter was adjourned and listed for 7th May 2026 at 3:30 pm under "Part Heard" status to conclude arguments from Defendants 3 and 4. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
At 4.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
-
22-Apr-2026
At 4.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
-
22-Apr-2026
At 4.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
-
21-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF
-
18-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
For Direction
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
-
12-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
-
20-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF
-
19-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF
-
19-Jan-2026
For Direction
Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla
-
15-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF
-
15-Dec-2025
For Direction
Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla
-
19-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF
-
19-Nov-2025
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla
-
25-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF
-
25-Sep-2025
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla
-
15-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla
-
04-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF
-
04-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF
-
30-Jul-2025
At 01.00 Pm
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla
-
15-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF
-
15-Jul-2025
At 01.00 Pm
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla
-
15-Jul-2025
Due Matters - Adjourned OS
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla
-
23-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF
-
20-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF
-
20-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. IA/2689/2025
Case Summary: IA/2689/2025 - Achal Jatia v. Amit Jatia & Ors. The High Court of Bombay adjourned these consolidated interim applications (relating to Suit Nos. 148 and 172 of 2025) on 4th May 2026. The court accepted six affidavits-in-reply filed by the plaintiff in Suit 172 of 2025 in response to interim applications by contesting defendants. The matter was adjourned and listed for 7th May 2026 at 3:30 pm under "Part Heard" status to conclude arguments from Defendants 3 and 4. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts