MOHAMMED SALIM MOHAMMED AHMED ANSARI vs ZULEKHA MOHAMMED AHMED ANSARI — MPT/669/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020169582026

e-Filing Number

07-05-2026

Filing Number

MPT/16958/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Registration No

MPT/669/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )

Sub-Category

HEIRSHIP CERTIFICATE. ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED SALIM MOHAMMED AHMED ANSARI

    Adv. Ragib Sk

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ZULEKHA MOHAMMED AHMED ANSARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    For Signing Grant

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted Mohammed Salim Mohammed Ahmed Ansari's petition for a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, recognizing him as the sole legal heir of deceased Zulekha Mohammed Ahmed Ansari. The court directed the department to issue the certificate within 3 weeks, subject to removal of any office objections, dispensing with the need for proclamation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MPT/669/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted Mohammed Salim Mohammed Ahmed Ansari's petition for a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, recognizing him as the sole legal heir of deceased Zulekha Mohammed Ahmed Ansari. The court directed the department to issue the certificate within 3 weeks, subject to removal of any office objections, dispensing with the need for proclamation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case