AVANSE FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. vs SHUBHAM ASHISH JHA — EXA/1181/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020169032024

Filing Number

EXA/16897/2024

Filing Date

22-May-2024

Registration No

EXA/1181/2025

Registration Date

25-Jun-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe , National Lok Adalat

Coram

Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe , National Lok Adalat

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AVANSE FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.

    Adv. GNP Legal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHUBHAM ASHISH JHA

  2. 2.SUSHIL KUMAR JHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe,national Lok AdalatView PDF

    Case Summary: EXA/1181/2025 The Bombay High Court granted Avanse Financial Services Ltd.'s withdrawal of its execution application and declared the underlying arbitral award void-ab-initio, holding that unilateral appointment of the arbitrator renders the award invalid even at the execution stage. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the period from original invocation excluded from limitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe , National Lok Adalat

  4. 22-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1181/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EXA/1181/2025 The Bombay High Court granted Avanse Financial Services Ltd.'s withdrawal of its execution application and declared the underlying arbitral award void-ab-initio, holding that unilateral appointment of the arbitrator renders the award invalid even at the execution stage. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the period from original invocation excluded from limitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case