KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK vs PAPPU LAKHAN SAW — EXA/488/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020168772023
Filing Number
EXA/16870/2023
Filing Date
22-Jun-2023
Registration No
EXA/488/2024
Registration Date
21-Feb-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK
Adv. ASHWIN S TRIPATHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.PAPPU LAKHAN SAW
-
2.CHAMPADEVI PAPPU SAW
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple matters involving Kotak Mahindra Bank because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed related execution and interim applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration with time already spent excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
22-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/488/2024
The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple matters involving Kotak Mahindra Bank because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed related execution and interim applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration with time already spent excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts