Mohd Yasin Abdul Hamid Qureshi vs Nasibi Abdul Hamid Qureshi alias Qureshi Nasibi A Hamid alias Nasibi Qureshi — MPT/739/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020168542026
e-Filing Number
06-05-2026
Filing Number
MPT/16854/2026
Filing Date
07-May-2026
Registration No
MPT/739/2026
Registration Date
10-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Bench Type
Single
Category
PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )
Sub-Category
HEIRSHIP CERTIFICATE. ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mohd Yasin Abdul Hamid Qureshi
Adv. Tripathi Associates
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nasibi Abdul Hamid Qureshi alias Qureshi Nasibi A Hamid alias Nasibi Qureshi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Jun-2026
For Signing Grant
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
The Bombay High Court granted Mohd. Yasin Abdul Hamid Qureshi's petition for issuance of a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, recognizing him as the sole surviving legal heir of deceased Nasibi Abdul Hamid Qureshi. The court found no impediment to the petition and directed the department to issue the certificate within 3 weeks, subject to removal of any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MPT/739/2026
The Bombay High Court granted Mohd. Yasin Abdul Hamid Qureshi's petition for issuance of a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, recognizing him as the sole surviving legal heir of deceased Nasibi Abdul Hamid Qureshi. The court found no impediment to the petition and directed the department to issue the certificate within 3 weeks, subject to removal of any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts