Mukesh alias Mohanlal Dhanesha PURNANAND AND CO vs Swastik Constructions — IA/5628/2025
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section OrderXXIRule11(2). Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020168512025
e-Filing Number
05-06-2025
Filing Number
IA/16850/2025
Filing Date
05-Jun-2025
Registration No
IA/5628/2025
Registration Date
25-Sep-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mukesh alias Mohanlal Dhanesha PURNANAND AND CO
-
2.Sarla Mahendra Dhanesh
Adv. PURNANAND AND CO
-
3.Hitesh Mahendra Dhanesha
Adv. PURNANAND AND CO
-
4.Bharat Mahendra Dhanesha
Adv. PURNANAND AND CO
-
5.Shilpa Jagdish Patel
Adv. PURNANAND AND CO
-
6.Bhavna Avinash Dahima
Adv. PURNANAND AND CO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Swastik Constructions
-
2.Radha Enterprises
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jul-2026
Due Matters - Adjourned OS
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
The High Court of Bombay disposed of a commercial execution application by Mukesh Dhanesha & others against Swastik Constructions & others on the basis of consent terms signed by all parties on 8th May 2026. The court accepted the undertakings contained in the consent terms as court undertakings and disposed both the execution application and the connected interim application accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
-
30-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
-
05-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. IA/5628/2025
The High Court of Bombay disposed of a commercial execution application by Mukesh Dhanesha & others against Swastik Constructions & others on the basis of consent terms signed by all parties on 8th May 2026. The court accepted the undertakings contained in the consent terms as court undertakings and disposed both the execution application and the connected interim application accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts