PRABHAVATI HINDO AND 3 ORS. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA 2 ORS. — WP/1697/2017

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Jul-2017

CNR: HCBM020167752017

Filing Number

WP/1841/2017

Filing Date

11-Jul-2017

Registration No

WP/1697/2017

Registration Date

20-Jul-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRABHAVATI HINDO AND 3 ORS.

    Adv. B R Zaveri

  2. 2.PALI MARKET KOLI MAHILA SEVA SANSTHA

  3. 3.DINESH GUPTA

  4. 4.PALI MARKET SHOPKEEPERS WELFARE SOC.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA 2 ORS.

  2. 2.MCGM

  3. 3.MARKET INSPECTOR PALI MUNICIPAL MARKET OF MCGM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam,hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court quashed the stallage charge demand notices issued to petitioners operating retail stalls at Pali Market during its redevelopment. The court found that a new policy decision by MCGM exempted retail occupants who did not avail transit camp facilities during redevelopment from paying stallage charges, penalties, or GST, making the impugned notices dated May 18 and June 29, 2017 invalid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Sep-2020

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice S.J. Kathawalla

  4. 03-Jan-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla,hon'ble Shri Justice S.J. KathawallaView PDF

  5. 18-Oct-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel,hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. DharmadhikariView PDF

  6. 30-Aug-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel,hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. DharmadhikariView PDF

  7. 12-Jul-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel,hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. DharmadhikariView PDF

  8. 03-May-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. DharmadhikariView PDF

  9. 29-Mar-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla,hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. DharmadhikariView PDF

  10. 14-Mar-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla,hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. DharmadhikariView PDF

  11. 14-Mar-2019

    Due For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla , Hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. Dharmadhikari

  12. 30-Jan-2019

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.View PDF

  13. 17-Dec-2018

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere,hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.View PDF

  14. 17-Dec-2018

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.

  15. 03-Dec-2018

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere,hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.View PDF

  16. 03-Dec-2018

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.

  17. 26-Oct-2018

    Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. KulkarniView PDF

  18. 26-Oct-2018

    For Admission

    Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni

  19. 20-Jul-2017

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Vasant Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. OkaView PDF

  20. 20-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 11-Jul-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1697/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court quashed the stallage charge demand notices issued to petitioners operating retail stalls at Pali Market during its redevelopment. The court found that a new policy decision by MCGM exempted retail occupants who did not avail transit camp facilities during redevelopment from paying stallage charges, penalties, or GST, making the impugned notices dated May 18 and June 29, 2017 invalid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case