Neuralbits Technologies Private Limited vs Suvarna Technosoft Private Limited — HCBM20167702026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 51. Disposed: DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020167702026

e-Filing Number

07-05-2026

Filing Number

LPETN/16770/2026

Filing Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 51

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Neuralbits Technologies Private Limited

    Adv. Punit Kachalia

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Suvarna Technosoft Private Limited

  2. 2.Myhealth Innovations Private Limited

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted Neuralbits Technologies' Leave Petition under Clause XII of the Letters Patent, permitting it to file a suit against Suvarna Technosoft and Myhealth Innovations for breach of confidentiality, spring-boarding, and copyright infringement despite the defendants being partially outside the Court's jurisdiction. The Court found that although part of the cause of action arose outside its jurisdiction, the material part arose within Mumbai, justifying the grant of leave to entertain the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    At 2.50 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 07-May-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted Neuralbits Technologies' Leave Petition under Clause XII of the Letters Patent, permitting it to file a suit against Suvarna Technosoft and Myhealth Innovations for breach of confidentiality, spring-boarding, and copyright infringement despite the defendants being partially outside the Court's jurisdiction. The Court found that although part of the cause of action arose outside its jurisdiction, the material part arose within Mumbai, justifying the grant of leave to entertain the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case