AEROFLEX ENTERPRISES LIMITED (THIRD PARTY APPLICANT) vs PRIYANKA PRADYUMNA KUMAR SHARMA — HCBM20167532026

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 1. Disposed: Certified Copy Issue on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020167532026

Filing Number

TPAC/16752/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Judge

E.B. Sivakumar(Addl. Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master)

Coram

E.B. Sivakumar(Addl. Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master)

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Certified Copy Issue

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AEROFLEX ENTERPRISES LIMITED (THIRD PARTY APPLICANT)

    Adv. KHUSHNUMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRIYANKA PRADYUMNA KUMAR SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Addl.registrar(os)/Addl. Protho. and Sr. MasterView PDF

    The Bombay High Court allowed Aeroflex Enterprises Limited's Third Party Application seeking certified copies of records from Testamentary Petition No. 1299 of 2014 and the probate granted on 14 January 2019. The court found sufficient cause, as Aeroflex owns property acquired through the deceased's will and requires these documents for related proceedings before the Allahabad High Court, and directed the office to issue certified copies on payment of charges, with restrictions on their use and dissemination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Direction

    E.B. Sivakumar(Addl. Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master)

  4. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed Aeroflex Enterprises Limited's Third Party Application seeking certified copies of records from Testamentary Petition No. 1299 of 2014 and the probate granted on 14 January 2019. The court found sufficient cause, as Aeroflex owns property acquired through the deceased's will and requires these documents for related proceedings before the Allahabad High Court, and directed the office to issue certified copies on payment of charges, with restrictions on their use and dissemination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case