NANDKUMAR YADAVRAO TASGAONKAR vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS — HCBM20167512026
Case under Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 Section 1. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020167512026
Filing Number
IA/16750/2026
Filing Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NANDKUMAR YADAVRAO TASGAONKAR
Adv. AKSHAY R KAPADIA
-
2.VANDANA NANDKUMAR TASGAONKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS
-
2.THE COMMISSIONER (IMMIGRATION), BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION
-
3.PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
-
4.PUNJAB AND SIND BANK TH. ITS CHIEF MANAGER
-
5.ANDHRA BANK
Case History
-
29-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF
Case Summary The Bombay High Court allowed the interim applications filed by Nandkumar Yadavrao Tasgaonkar and Vandana Nandkumar Tasgaonkar, granting them permission to travel abroad despite Look Out Circulars issued by banks. The petitioners were permitted to travel to Tokyo (June 8-18, 2026) and Switzerland/Geneva (July 26-August 7, 2026) for educational conferences and business purposes, subject to strict conditions including depositing Rs. 60 lakhs with the court, filing detailed travel itineraries, and providing expense affidavits upon return. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-May-2026
For Circulation (O.s)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
-
25-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
-
06-May-2026
Case filed
Case Summary The Bombay High Court allowed the interim applications filed by Nandkumar Yadavrao Tasgaonkar and Vandana Nandkumar Tasgaonkar, granting them permission to travel abroad despite Look Out Circulars issued by banks. The petitioners were permitted to travel to Tokyo (June 8-18, 2026) and Switzerland/Geneva (July 26-August 7, 2026) for educational conferences and business purposes, subject to strict conditions including depositing Rs. 60 lakhs with the court, filing detailed travel itineraries, and providing expense affidavits upon return. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts