Joseph A DCunha vs Acknur Property Developers — HCBM20166582026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 1971. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
CNR: HCBM020166582026
e-Filing Number
05-05-2026
Filing Number
CONP/16657/2026
Filing Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Joseph A DCunha
Adv. Anmol Bartaria
-
2.Finian Anthony DCunha
Adv. Anmol Bartaria
-
3.Bemvinda DSouza nee DCunha
Adv. Anmol Bartaria
-
4.Sean DCunha
Adv. Anmol Bartaria
-
5.Maria Agnes DCunha
Adv. Anmol Bartaria
-
6.Candes Lourdes DCunha
Adv. Anmol Bartaria
-
7.Carling Maria DCunha
Adv. Anmol Bartaria
Respondent(s)
-
1.Acknur Property Developers
-
2.Deepak Rao
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jul-2026
Due Matters - Adjourned OS
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
-
19-Jun-2026
Contempt Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court admitted a Contempt Petition filed by Joseph A Dcunha against Acknur Property Developers, related to an underlying Arbitration Petition. The respondent's counsel entered appearance and accepted notice. The court directed the respondent to file a reply within four weeks, with rejoinder due within one week thereafter. The case was adjourned to June 19, 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-May-2026
Case filed
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court admitted a Contempt Petition filed by Joseph A Dcunha against Acknur Property Developers, related to an underlying Arbitration Petition. The respondent's counsel entered appearance and accepted notice. The court directed the respondent to file a reply within four weeks, with rejoinder due within one week thereafter. The case was adjourned to June 19, 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts