ADANI CAPITAL PVT LTD vs IMRAN ADBUL LATIF SHAIKH — EXA/1016/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020166542024

Filing Number

EXA/16649/2024

Filing Date

15-May-2024

Registration No

EXA/1016/2025

Registration Date

13-May-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ADANI CAPITAL PVT LTD

    Adv. NARAYAN AWATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.IMRAN ADBUL LATIF SHAIKH

  2. 2.ISRAR AHMAD MOHAMMAD IBRAHIM KHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (150+ consolidated cases) because the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, found void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent. Parties may reinitiate fresh arbitration with time already elapsed excluded from limitation periods, unless they have written agreements waiving objections under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 19-Mar-2025

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  5. 19-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 15-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1016/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (150+ consolidated cases) because the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, found void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent. Parties may reinitiate fresh arbitration with time already elapsed excluded from limitation periods, unless they have written agreements waiving objections under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case