HDFC BANK LIMITED vs GURNAAR LOGISTIKS PRIVATE LIMITED — EXA/3209/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020165952024
Filing Number
EXA/16590/2024
Filing Date
14-May-2024
Registration No
EXA/3209/2024
Registration Date
12-Nov-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HDFC BANK LIMITED
Adv. KISHOR CHALKE
Respondent(s)
-
1.GURNAAR LOGISTIKS PRIVATE LIMITED
-
2.GURPREET INDERJIT SANDHU
-
3.GURNAAR LOGISTIKS PRIVATE LIMITED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International* that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio, the court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless there exists a written waiver agreement under Section 12(5) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
14-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/3209/2024
The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International* that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio, the court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless there exists a written waiver agreement under Section 12(5) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts