INTEGRO FINSERV PRIVATE LIMITED DS LAW vs SAROJ LOGISTICS PVT.LTD. AND ORS Advocate - Madhuri, DEFE. NO 2,RES NO. 1 & 3,RES NO. 4,S K Srivastav and Co,S K Srivastav and Co — EXA/2304/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Dec-2019

CNR: HCBM020165402014

Filing Number

EXA/1301/2014

Filing Date

17-Jul-2014

Registration No

EXA/2304/2015

Registration Date

28-Oct-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INTEGRO FINSERV PRIVATE LIMITED DS LAW

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAROJ LOGISTICS PVT.LTD. AND ORS Advocate - Madhuri, DEFE. NO 2,RES NO. 1 & 3,RES NO. 4,S K Srivastav and Co,S K Srivastav and Co

  2. 2.SATYAVIR SINGH,

  3. 3.MAHESHPRASAD SURYADIN CHATURVEDI

  4. 4.SAROJ M CHATURVEDI

  5. 5.DEEPAK KANU MHATRE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    Case Summary: EXA/2304/2015 The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral awards in this execution application, finding that the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following Supreme Court precedent that such unilateral appointments are void ab initio, the court dismissed all related execution and interim applications. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the period of the earlier proceedings from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Dec-2019

    For Circulation (Original Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni

  4. 17-Jul-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2304/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EXA/2304/2015 The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral awards in this execution application, finding that the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following Supreme Court precedent that such unilateral appointments are void ab initio, the court dismissed all related execution and interim applications. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the period of the earlier proceedings from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case