Sunil Hari Pawar vs Kapil Baba Waghmare Advocate - BNS LEGAL — ARBP/228/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section Section9. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020165092026
e-Filing Number
05-05-2026
Filing Number
ARBP/16508/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
ARBP/228/2026
Registration Date
02-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
Interim Relief ( 102 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sunil Hari Pawar
Adv. Gaurav Lele
-
2.JOGENDRA SATYAPRAKASH SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kapil Baba Waghmare Advocate - BNS LEGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
Case Summary: ARBP/228/2026 - Sunil Hari Pawar v. Kapil Baba Waghmare The Bombay High Court rejected the petitioners' request for interim measures in a partnership dispute arising from a July 2018 partnership deed for "M/s. Brandwings Promotion." The petitioners alleged the respondent was misusing the firm's brand name, domain, email, and marketing materials, but the court found insufficient evidence that business activities were ongoing—noting the petitioners themselves indicated office closure in April 2026. The court appointed Ms. Mahek Bookwala as sole arbitrator to resolve all disputes, directing both parties to equally bear arbitration costs and proceed before the tribunal under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ARBP/228/2026
Case Summary: ARBP/228/2026 - Sunil Hari Pawar v. Kapil Baba Waghmare The Bombay High Court rejected the petitioners' request for interim measures in a partnership dispute arising from a July 2018 partnership deed for "M/s. Brandwings Promotion." The petitioners alleged the respondent was misusing the firm's brand name, domain, email, and marketing materials, but the court found insufficient evidence that business activities were ongoing—noting the petitioners themselves indicated office closure in April 2026. The court appointed Ms. Mahek Bookwala as sole arbitrator to resolve all disputes, directing both parties to equally bear arbitration costs and proceed before the tribunal under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts