PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, THANE vs JOHNSON MATTHEY CHEMICALS INDIA PVT. LTD. Advocate - Vasanti B. Patel, RESPONDENT — ITXA/2765/2018

Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.

Next hearing 23-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM020164512018

Filing Number

ITXA/1438/2018

Filing Date

19-Jun-2018

Registration No

ITXA/2765/2018

Registration Date

15-Oct-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

Bench Type

Division

Category

DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, THANE

    Adv. SHARMA AKHILESHWAR,-, -,-

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JOHNSON MATTHEY CHEMICALS INDIA PVT. LTD. Advocate - Vasanti B. Patel, RESPONDENT

Case History

  1. 23-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jul-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF

    Case Summary: ITXA/2765/2018 The High Court of Bombay adjourned the Income Tax Appeal between the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Thane (appellant) and Johnson Matthey Chemicals India Pvt. Ltd. (respondent) to 23rd July 2026 at the request of the respondent's counsel. No substantive order on merits was passed; the matter was merely listed for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Oct-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 19-Jun-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. ITXA/2765/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ITXA/2765/2018 The High Court of Bombay adjourned the Income Tax Appeal between the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Thane (appellant) and Johnson Matthey Chemicals India Pvt. Ltd. (respondent) to 23rd July 2026 at the request of the respondent's counsel. No substantive order on merits was passed; the matter was merely listed for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case