SHEETAL RAJESH PENDURKAR SUSHIL A.INAMDAR vs ANJALI RAMESH PATIL — MPT/637/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020164282026

e-Filing Number

04-05-2026

Filing Number

MPT/16427/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

MPT/637/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )

Sub-Category

HEIRSHIP CERTIFICATE. ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHEETAL RAJESH PENDURKAR SUSHIL A.INAMDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANJALI RAMESH PATIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    For Signing Grant

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted petitioner Sheetal Rajesh Pendurkar's petition and issued a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, certifying her as the sole legal heir and representative of the deceased Anjali Ramesh Patil. The court found no impediment to allowing the petition and directed the department to issue the certificate within 3 weeks, subject to compliance with any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MPT/637/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted petitioner Sheetal Rajesh Pendurkar's petition and issued a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, certifying her as the sole legal heir and representative of the deceased Anjali Ramesh Patil. The court found no impediment to allowing the petition and directed the department to issue the certificate within 3 weeks, subject to compliance with any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case