SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD. vs HASAN MOHD YASIN SHAIKH — EXA/2099/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020164152022

Filing Number

EXA/16411/2022

Filing Date

24-May-2022

Registration No

EXA/2099/2022

Registration Date

14-Dec-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD.

    Adv. Devendra Vitthal Nawadkar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HASAN MOHD YASIN SHAIKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.'s execution application against Hasan Mohd Yasin Shaikh, declaring the arbitral award void-ab-initio because the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral. The court, relying on a recent Supreme Court judgment, held that arbitral awards can be set aside at the execution stage on this ground, and permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    For Dismissal Under Rule 329

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

  4. 24-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2099/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.'s execution application against Hasan Mohd Yasin Shaikh, declaring the arbitral award void-ab-initio because the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral. The court, relying on a recent Supreme Court judgment, held that arbitral awards can be set aside at the execution stage on this ground, and permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case