M/S. RELIGARE FINVEST LTD. VIRTUOUS PEOPLE AJAY UPPAL AND HAMID MULLA vs RTSTAR SOLITAIRS and ORS. — EXA/555/2011

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020162042011

Filing Number

EXA/1234/2011

Filing Date

15-Jul-2011

Registration No

EXA/555/2011

Registration Date

18-Jul-2011

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. RELIGARE FINVEST LTD. VIRTUOUS PEOPLE AJAY UPPAL AND HAMID MULLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RTSTAR SOLITAIRS and ORS.

  2. 2.NITIN RATILAL SHAH

  3. 3.KALAPANA NITIN SHAH

  4. 4.RUPESH SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrator had been unilaterally appointed in violation of arbitration law principles established by the Supreme Court in Bhadra International. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, but permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations, unless parties had executed a written waiver under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 15-Jul-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/555/2011

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrator had been unilaterally appointed in violation of arbitration law principles established by the Supreme Court in Bhadra International. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, but permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations, unless parties had executed a written waiver under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case