MANJU ASHOK PATIL vs APEX GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE — WP/2412/2026

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020161602026

Filing Number

WP/16160/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

WP/2412/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

SLUM AREAS ( 49 )

Sub-Category

Slum areas ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJU ASHOK PATIL

    Adv. Tushar Kochale

  2. 2.SHRI IBRAHIM ESMAIL KHAN (WRONG NAME OF JAINABEE YAKUB SHAIKH)

  3. 3.NOORJAHAN NOORMOHAMMAD SHAIKH

  4. 4.TUKARAM YASHWANT ADATE

  5. 5.IBRAHIM KHAN

  6. 6.SANGEETA RAMESH VALMIKI

  7. 7.RAMESH B VALMIKI

  8. 8.SARA IBRAHIM KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.APEX GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE

  2. 2.DEPUTY COLLECTOR (SPECIAL CELL) EASTERN SUBURBS, SRA

  3. 3.SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY, THROUGH ITS CEO

  4. 4.NAVJEEVAN B CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN/SECRETARY

  5. 5.HANUMAN NAGAR VIKAS MANDAL THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT / SECRETARY

  6. 6.LAKE VIEW DEVELOPERS

  7. 7.ROCK SPACES PVT. LTD.

  8. 8.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOUSING DEPT.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    Case Summary: Manju Ashok Patil v. Apex Grievance Redressal Committee Decision: The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging eviction orders for 8 slum dwellers in an SRA rehabilitation scheme, finding no merit in their challenge. Of the 8 petitioners, 6 were declared eligible and will receive transit accommodation; the other 2 will receive alternate accommodation for 11 months pending eligibility determination. The court granted a 7-day grace period for voluntary vacation subject to filing an undertaking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2412/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Manju Ashok Patil v. Apex Grievance Redressal Committee Decision: The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging eviction orders for 8 slum dwellers in an SRA rehabilitation scheme, finding no merit in their challenge. Of the 8 petitioners, 6 were declared eligible and will receive transit accommodation; the other 2 will receive alternate accommodation for 11 months pending eligibility determination. The court granted a 7-day grace period for voluntary vacation subject to filing an undertaking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case